Legal Opinion

Briggs v. CHANNEL 4, KGBT

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 28, 1987No. 13-87-007-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

In this summary judgment case, we are presented with the issue of whether a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding appellant’s libel cause of action. In seven points of error, appellant primarily raises issues regarding his status as a public figure under the standard of New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 94 S.Ct. 2997,41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974), and the existence of a fact issue on appellees’ actual malice.

In reviewing a summary judgment, we follow the well-established rules…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CHANNEL 4, KGBT v. BriggsTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Brasher v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Krueger v. AustadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. World Boxing Council v. CosellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  5. CHANNEL 4, KGBT v. BriggsTexas Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API