Briggs v. CHANNEL 4, KGBT
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
In this summary judgment case, we are presented with the issue of whether a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding appellant’s libel cause of action. In seven points of error, appellant primarily raises issues regarding his status as a public figure under the standard of New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 94 S.Ct. 2997,41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974), and the existence of a fact issue on appellees’ actual malice.
In reviewing a summary judgment, we follow the well-established rules…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CHANNEL 4, KGBT v. BriggsTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Brasher v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Krueger v. AustadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- World Boxing Council v. CosellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- CHANNEL 4, KGBT v. BriggsTexas Supreme Court · 1988