Legal Opinion

Waddell v. Arnett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 14, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boat), C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appeal in this ease will be dismissed because there was no final judgment entered in the court below. The case ■comes up on an intervention by trustees in bankruptcy, as claimants in .an attachment by Waddell of a crop of wheat of the bankrupt. The attachment was sued out within four months prior to the bankruptcy proceeding, and was therefore nullified under section 67f of the National Bankruptcy Act. Crook Horner Co. v. Gilpin, 112 Md. 1. The sheriff liad sold the wheat and passed the proceeds, over to the attaching creditor, and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Emersonian Apartments v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  2. Crook Horner Co. v. GilpinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  3. Chappell v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. Warfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  5. Marx v. ReineckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Penny v. Department of Maryland State PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Smith v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API