Legal Opinion
Paul v. Board of Professional Discipline
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 2000No. 24385, 24386PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
Dr. Francis Paul (Dr. Paul), a neurosurgeon, lost his license to practice medicine as a result of proceedings before the Board of Professional Discipline of the Idaho State Board of Medicine. He appeals that decision.
I
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
On October 6,1995, the Idaho State Board of Medicine (the Board) filed a complaint against Dr. Paul, charging him with violating the Idaho Medical Practice Act, Idaho Code § 54-1814(7). The complaint alleged that Dr. Paul had provided substandard care to twelve patients in Idaho Falls. A hearing was conducted before a hearing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ferguson v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Matter of WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Boley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- First Interstate Bank of Idaho, NA v. WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Woodfield v. Board of Professional Discipline of the Idaho State Board of MedicineIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pearl v. BPD OF IDAHO STATE BD. OF MEDICINEIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Halvorson v. North Latah County Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Haw v. Idaho State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Laurino v. Board of Professional DisciplineIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- South Valley Ground Water v. ID Dept of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.