Legal Opinion

Loethscher v. Campo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 4, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The plaintiff was injured by a fragment of a tree stump which was thrown through the air by a blast of dynamite exploded in it by the defendant for the purpose of breaking it up. From a verdict in favor of the plaintiff the defendant has appealed. He complains of certain rulings on evidence. During his cross-examination, he testified that, on a certain day, the compensation which he had been receiving under the Workmen’s Compensation Act ceased, and he was then asked if he took an appeal, and this question the trial court excluded. It does not appear that there was an order of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Menzie v. KalmonowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Worth v. DunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  3. Pollak v. Danbury Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Wright v. BlakesleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Krooner v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Starkel v. Edward Balf Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. Murphy v. OssolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. Soucy v. WysockiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  4. Title Guaranty Co. v. BaroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. State v. BerglundConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API