Legal Opinion

Steele v. Gold Fissure Gold Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1908No. 5244; No. 2868 C. APublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County. Hon. Frank T. Johnson, Judge. Action by Clay B. Steele against The Gold Fissure Gold Mining Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

The relation of a director to the corporation which he represents in that capacity is fiduciary, and for this reason the law forbids him from making a contract in which his private interests may conflict with the interests of his principal. He cannot unite his personal and representative character in the same transaction. — Paxton v. Herron, 41 Colo. 147; Morgan v. King, 27 Colo. 539; Fishel v. Goddard, 30 Colo. 147; Mosher v. Sinott, 20 Colo. App. 454; Butts v. Wood, 37 N. Y. 317; Coleman v. 2nd Ave. R. R. Co., 38 N. Y. 201; Hoyle v. Pittsburgh & Mo. R. R. Co., 54 N. Y. 314; Martin v. Santa…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miner v. Belle Isle Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Butts v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Hoyle v. Plattsburgh & Montreal RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Morgan v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marguerite Irwin v. West End Development Company, a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  2. Wonderful Group Mining Co. v. RandWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Irwin v. West End Development CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1972
  4. O'MALLEY v. CaseyColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. In re Wenatchee-Stratford Orchard Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API