Legal Opinion

Smith Builders Supply, Inc. v. Rivenbark

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The court below has ruled correctly upon the admitted facts here presented. The lien of the deed of trust to secure the purchase money loaned, which had been executed and recorded simultaneously with the deed to the vendees, was superior to that of the materialman.

The principle has been uniformly upheld here that a deed and a mortgage to the vendor for the purchase price, executed at the same time, are regarded as one transaction. The title does not rest in the vendee but merely passes through his hands, and during such instantaneous passage no lien against the vendee can attach to the title…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chemical Co. v. . WalstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Moring v. . DickersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Bunting v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Hinton v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Humphrey v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Childers v. Parker's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Carolina Builders Corp. v. Howard-Veasey Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Pegram-West, Inc. v. Hiatt Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Dalton Moran Shook Inc. v. Pitt Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Slate v. MarionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API