Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Barnett
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Robb, J.:
This is an appeal in a declaratory judgment action wherein the trial court held in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff.
Plaintiff is the liability insurance company with which defendant J. R. Ramett had a policy of automobile insurance. Defendants Arthur E. Kohls and Kathryn Kohls filed separate damage actions against Minnie Ramett arising out of a set of facts involving an automobile accident where Minnie’s negligence caused personal injury and damage to Kathryn, her daughter. A short time after the accident and while Kathryn was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pugh v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- McAdam v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Riley v. HogueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harshberger v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters v. GardinerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Alliance Mutual Casualty Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Holmstrom v. SullivanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Hotchkiss v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.