Boyett v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for seduction; from Berrien superior court — Judge Thomas. June 27, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.
The defendant was convicted of seduction, and excepts to the overruling of his motion for a new trial, based on the usual general grounds and on several special grounds. Each of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial is hereafter mentioned and discussed in its proper order. The defendant relies on the contention that the evidence as a whole shows that the sexual commerce between the accused and the woman alleged to have been seduced was entirely meretricious, and therefore that the verdict for seduction is not supported by the evidence. The special grounds of the motion for a new…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- O'Neill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Disharoon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Woodard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Hays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Durrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Widenhouse v. RussSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Helton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.