Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. Central Nat. Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1889Published

Creditors’ bill. On demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

The questions here considered arise upon a demurrer to the complaint. In July, 1884, the firm of Halsted, Haines & Oo. made a general assignment for the benefit of creditors. Under that assignment the defendant the Central National Bank was a preferred creditor to the amount of $40,000, and this amount of money was actually paid to it by. the assignee. Some time after the assignment, and after the payment of the $40,000, one of the plaintiffs recovered judgment against the assignors, and at intervals thereafter, during a period ending in December, 1887, the other plaintiffs recovered other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Murphy v. . BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Seymour v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Rathbun v. PlatnerNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Coope v. BowlesNew York Supreme Court · 1865

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API