Legal Opinion

People v. Kinard

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1910No. Crim. No. 284PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

The defendant was charged in the information with the crime of embezzlement in having received and appropriated to his own use, on the tenth day of December, 1907, the sum of $225, the property of one Mrs. Louisa Lamprell. The evidence shows that on the twenty-fourth day of October, 1906, Mrs. Lamprell drew a check on the Oakland Bank of Savings in favor of the defendant, and expressly instructed the defendant not to draw the money until such time as she should send for it from Australia, where she intended to go on a visit. The defendant, contrary to his instructions, cashed the check on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ViceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  2. People v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Territory of Arizona v. MonroeArizona Supreme Court · 1906
  4. People v. FlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. DoctorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Sautter v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. People v. JosephCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API