Legal Opinion

People v. Fly

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1895No. Crim. No. 6PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.'

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

The defendant was informed against, tried, and convicted in the county of San Diego of the crime of embezzlement, and sentenced to the state prison for a term of two years. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying him a new trial.

The property charged to have been embezzled was a horse, wagon, and harness. It appeared without conflict that defendant and a confederate took the property charged in the county of San Diego and carried it into the county of Orange, where they sold or traded off the horse, but retained the wagon and harness, which latter were found in their possession…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. KinardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API