Legal Opinion

Ferry-Hallock Co. v. Progressive Paper Box Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 19, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On bill, answer, cross-bill and replication.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, Y. C.

At the hearing I gave orally my views to some extent on the rights of the parties, reserving final determination for briefs on the following points—first, whether in the Ferry-Waring Company suit, referred to at the hearing, it had been expressly decided that the complainant’s patents, or any of them, covered “stays” as well as “rings,” and second, whether complainant’s representation or claim at the time of procuring the license, that “stays” were covered by its patents, made to defendant under the circumstances proved, was such a representation of fact on which defendants were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. BurnhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
  2. The Engineering Co. v. Perryman Electric Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Invengineering, Inc. v. Foregger Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
  4. LeDUC v. JT Baker Chemical Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Scannell v. Ransome Concrete Machinery Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API