Legal Opinion
Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 25, 1985No. 82 C 4737PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Maxine Scott (“Scott”) charges Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) with employment discrimination in violation of:
1. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (“Title VII”) and
2. the Illinois Human Rights Act (the “Act”), Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 68, ¶¶ 1-101 to 9-102.
Scott also claims her termination by Sears violated its implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing under the employ ment contract between them. 1 Sears has now moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56 for summary judgment. For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Sandra G. Bundy v. Delbert Jackson, Director, D.C. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Dr. N. Jay ROGERS Et Al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Castaneda v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Helen Brooms, Cross-Appellee v. Regal Tube Company, Copperweld Corporation and Charles Gustafson, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Volk v. ColerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Maxine SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Zick v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.