Legal Opinion

United Mercantile Agencies, Inc. v. Slotsky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1935No. Appeal, 368PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

In this case of assumpsit, Judge Tumolillo of the municipal court, sitting without a jury, found for the defendants.

The sole question before us is whether the correspondence between the parties created a binding contract.

On December 9, 1931, defendants, clothing manufacturers, wrote a letter to- the plaintiff, who was engaged in the business of collecting delinquent accounts, stating that a merchandising company in Memphis, Tenn., was indebted to them in the sum of $3,943.21, and requested plaintiff to collect the account on the usual Commercial Law League of America…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vitro Manufacturing Co. v. Standard Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Jaxtheimer v. Sharpsville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Rasche & Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Service Prod. Inc. v. Am. Insul. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. Olan MillsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc. v. ProffittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. James A. Gainey v. Brotherhood Of Railway And Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express And Station EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  4. Sipowicz v. OlivieriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API