Legal Opinion

Rasche & Co. v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1923No. Appeal, No. 43PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The plaintiff is a dealer in sugar, having a place of business in Cincinnati, Ohio. It employed one Thompson, to distribute its product, and he in turn came in contact with a brokerage firm, Turner Brothers, of Philadelphia. An offer was made to sell through the latter 1,000 bags of a certain kind at a fixed price. Before an acceptance by the defendant had been received, the product was otherwise disposed of, but Rasche & Company agreed to sell a like amount of another grade, and, through the local brokers, sent the following telegram: “Confirm Campbell 1000 bags…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hutchinson Baking Co. v. MarvelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Johnston & Lyon v. FesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  3. Pennsylvania Lubricating Co. v. WilhelmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Dodd v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riddle Co. v. TaubelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. United Mercantile Agencies, Inc. v. SlotskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. McGowan v. Lustig-Burgerhoff Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Penn Discount Corp. v. SharpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Hill v. Marcus & HoltzmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API