Legal Opinion

Hilliard v. Beto

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1974No. 72-1869PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Following the panel’s decision in Hil-liard v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1972, 465 F.2d 829 the Court on its own motion took the case en banc. Upon further consideration the full Court remanded the case to the panel since even the most conservative reading of the factual allegations of petitioner’s § 2254 complaint shows that he is claiming to be the victim of a broken plea bargain, but there has been no factual hearing to determine whether this claim is -supported. Indeed there was not even so much as a show cause order which would have produced the Texas state court record including the proceedings on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. L. D. Hilliard v. Dr. George J. BetoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Herminio H. Gallegos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Herminio H. Gallegos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. United States v. Winfield L. Roberts, A/K/A WinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Frank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Joe Frank v. United States of America, No. 74-2130 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Hilliard v. BetoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API