Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Vitino's Pizza

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1989No. 1—88—3026PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Plaintiff, Jose Gomez, obtained a default judgment against defendants, Vitino’s Pizza and James Pugh. Prior to satisfaction of the judgment, defendant Vito DeFrancesco was added as a party and judgment was entered against him. Defendants Vitino’s Pizza and DeFrancesco now appeal. We address the issue of whether a person can be named as a party defendant under section 6 of “An Act in relation to the use of an assumed name in the conduct or transaction of business in this State” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 96, par. 8a) (Assumed Business Name Act or Act) when plaintiff failed to sue unknown…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ketcham v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Curtis v. Albion-Brown's Post 590 American LegionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. Gulley v. FountalasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. Dow Chemical Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API