Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Dow Chemical Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 26, 1993No. 1-92-0210PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

Plaintiff Elyse Roberts appeals the dismissal of her second amended complaint which alleged product liability, battery, wilful and wanton conduct and negligence (the second amended complaint also alleged a fraud count but plaintiff does not appeal the dismissal of this count) against defendants The Dow Chemical Company (Dow), Matthew W. Cockrell, Coffield Ungaretti Harris and Slavin, and Rivkin Radler Dunne and Bayh. Plaintiff alleges on appeal that the circuit court erred in dismissing her complaint and in denying her post-judgment motion.

In 1986, plaintiff sued Dow for injuries she received…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meyer v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Mielke v. Condell Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Hill v. Chicago Housing AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Chicago Transit Authority v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Kohls v. Maryland Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Evanston HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Thornwood, Inc. v. Jenner & BlockAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Dickman v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Donkle v. LindAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. Donkle v. LindAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API