Legal Opinion

State v. Jamison

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The defendant was tried and convicted, in the district court for McLeod county, on an indictment for abduction, and appeals from an order by Edson, J., refusing a new trial. • cited People v. Plath, 100 N. Y. 590; Hoberg v. State, 3 Minn. 181, (262;) Lowry v. Harris, 12 Minn. 166, (255;) State v. Hoyt, 13 Minn. 125, (132.)

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The indictment in this case is for abduction, under Penal Code, § 240, subd. 1. It charges that' “the defendant, at the village of Glencoe, in the county- of McLeod, did wilfully,- unlawfully, and feloniously take a certain unmarried female, named Emma Urbach, out of the possession of Henrietta Urbach, her mother and guardian, for the purposes of sexual intercourse, she, the said'Emma Urbach, being then and there an unmarried girl under the. age of sixteen years, to wit, of the age of fifteen years; contrary,” etc. The statute provides as follows, (subdivision 1:) “A person who takes a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. State v. KeithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. McCarthy's St. Louis Park Cafe, Inc. v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. State v. RichardsWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. LauzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API