State v. Keith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Lyon county, Webber, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The defendant was convicted under an indictment for the offence of abduction as specified in the first subdivision of section 240 of the Penal Code, by the terms of which a person who “takes a female under the age of sixteen years for the purpose of * * *■ sexual intercourse” is declared to be guilty of this offence. The specification of the offence, as alleged in the indictment, is that the defendant, at a time and place mentioned, “did unlawfully, wil-fully, and feloniously take one Nora M. Greenslitt into a certain building (particularly described as a livery stable) for the purpose of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- People v. CarrierMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. BrinkhausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- State v. WenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. SpauldingIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. BuchalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- State v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.