Legal Opinion
Glass v. Featherly
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided May 3, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00280Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 MICHAEL GLASS, Case No. 3:22-CV-00280-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT 6 v. [ECF No. 22] 7 FEATHERLY, et. al., 8 Defendants. 9 Before the Court is Plaintiff Michael Glass’s (“Glass”) motion for leave to file a first 10 amended complaint. (ECF No. 22.) Defendant Daniel Featherly (“Featherly”) filed a non- 11 opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 24.) For the reasons stated below, the Court grants 12 Glass’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. 13 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.