State v. Lemieux

RUDMAN, Justice.

The State appeals from the order of the District Court (Biddeford, Humphrey, J.) granting David Lemieux’s motion to suppress “all evidence of his identity; all evidence with respect to his state of sobriety; all evidence of his alleged refusal to submit to a chemical *212test; and all statements made to Officers Labonte, Carrier, and Snow” on the basis that officer Todd Labonte was acting without lawful authority to conduct a vehicle stop. The State’s appeal1 challenges the court’s interpretation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2501 (Pamph. 1994).2 Because that section does not prohibit an…