Legal Opinion

Inman & Co. v. St. Louis Southwesten Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

Appellant brought this suit to recover of appellee actual and exemplary damages for its refusal to receive at and transport from the stations upon its road of Frost, Powell and Blooming Drove, by way of Corsicana and the Houston & Texas Central Railroad, to Houston, Texas, a large number of bales of uncompressed cotton tendered to appellee by appellants’ agents at the named points, and to recover also numerous penalties for violations of statutes charged in the petition.

There is no question raised upon the pleadings, and a statement of them is unnecessary. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Denver & New Orleans RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hume Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MackieTexas Supreme Court · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Central Stock Yards Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. R. D. Jones Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API