Legal Opinion

United States v. Henry

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 6, 2009No. 07-3142PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves the question whether harassing telephone calls made by Ricardo Henry to the family of a government auditor constitute obstructing justice within the meaning of § 3C1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) and so justified a two-point enhancement of his sentence. Section 3C1.1 requires “willful” conduct. Although a finding regarding a defendant’s intent to obstruct justice may not be required where conduct is obviously obstructive and the defendant knew it would be, the obstructive nature of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Dorcely, DanielCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Juan VegaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Tirrell ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Joseph JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Christian BordaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API