Legal Opinion
Paesch v. Winter
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 14, 1966No. 10571PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Mandamus is sought by the petitioner to compel the Federal District Judge for the District of Maryland to rescind his order transferring to the Middle District of Pennsylvania for trial the civil action, No. 16,300, filed in the former court by the petitioner as plaintiff against American Cyanamid Company. The purpose of the suit is to recover damages for the death of his wife in the explosion on June 26, 1964 of the defendant’s truck on a Pennsylvania highway. The transfer was granted on motion of the defendant.
Whether or not we have the power to issue the writ in the circumstances, we need…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clayton v. WarlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Donald D. Morehead v. Honorable A. D. Barksdale, Judge of the District Court for the Western District of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Paesch v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1966
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hewlett Akers v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. The Honorable Ted Dalton, United States District Court Judge for the Western District of Virginia, Hewlett Akers, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- King v. Johnson Wax Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1983
- Socialist Workers Party v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
- Akers v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Morganstern v. Marriott-Hot Shoppes, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.