Legal Opinion
Finucane v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 2000No. 29A02-9912-CV-856PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Hamilton Proper North, LLC purchased certain real estate from Gary Secrest. The same real estate was subsequently sold at a sheriffs sale to Stuart Finucane to satisfy a judgment and decree of foreclosure in favor of Union Planters Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) and against Secrest. Finucane now appeals, challenging the trial court’s judgment vacating the sheriffs sale and setting aside the sheriffs deed.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Finucane presents the following issues for our review, which we restate as:(1) Whether the trial court erred when it vacated the sheriffs sale…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Egbert v. EGBERTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Newhouse v. Farmers National Bank of ShelbyvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Posey County v. ChamnessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Smith v. Federal Land Bank of LouisvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Corby v. SwankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EstepIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Cain v. BackIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Indi Investments, LLC v. Credit Union 1Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Kraft, LLC v. Greiner (In Re Kraft, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
- Surrisi v. BremnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011