In Re the Paternity of A.H., A.E., A.M., A.I., A.N. A.G. v. A.H.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: KATHLEEN M. SWEENEY SCOTT P. WYATT Indianapolis, Indiana MATTHEW T. LEES Campbell Kyle Proffitt LLP Carmel, Indiana Apr 23 2013, 9:27 am IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA IN RE THE PATERNITY OF A.H., A.E., A.M., ) A.I., A.N.: ) ) A.G., ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. 49A02-1208-JP-668 ) A.H., ) ) Appellee. ) )…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kirchoff v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Young v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Hamiter v. TorrenceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Trabucco v. TrabuccoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Saalfrank v. SaalfrankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008