Hamiter v. Torrence
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge
Ingram M. Hamiter (“Mother”) appeals the trial court’s modification of Brian Tor-rence’s (“Father”) child support obligation for their child. We reverse and remand, holding that the trial court erred to the extent it reduced the presumptive child support amount in an effort to exclude Father’s overtime pay as a component of his child support obligation and in' deviating from the presumptive child support amount due to a “windfall.”
Issues
Mother raises two issues for our review, which we restate as follows:
1. Whether the trial court properly determined the amount of Father’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. BurnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Kinsey v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Dye v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by12 opinions
- Buhring v. TavolettiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Railing v. HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Airgas Mid-America, Inc. v. LongIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Anthony Fisher v. Thomas VanVleet and Dustin Gary (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hamiter v. TorrenceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.