Legal Opinion
Wolfsen Land & Cattle Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 24, 2011No. 10-580 LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Chief Judge.
Before the court are Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations and Natural Resources Defense Council’s Motion to Intervene as Defendants (Motion to Intervene or Mot.), filed March 8, 2011, Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 15; Memorandum in Support of Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations and Natural Resources Defense Council’s Motion to Intervene as Defendants (Memorandum or Mem.), filed March 8, 2011, Dkt. No. 16; Declaration of Glen H. Spain in Support of Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations and Natural Resources Defense…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Anderson Columbia Environmental, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wolfsen Land & Cattle Co v. Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's AssociationsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- City of Fresno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Harmony West Ashley LLC v. Charleston South Carolina, City ofDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Wolfsen Land & Cattle Co v. Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's AssociationsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012