Legal Opinion
Burton v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 4, 1973No. 7448PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Justice.
Defendants below appeal from an order overruling their pleas of privilege to be sued in Travis County. The defendants are the five individuals who, along with the plaintiff, constitute the Texas Optometry Board created under the provisions of Art. 4552-2.01, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. (Supp.1972). 1 Plaintiff sought a declaration that a specific interpretation of § 5.09 of the Act adopted by defendants was null and void because: (a) it was violative of the provisions of § 2.14 of the Act; (b) the interpretation was ultra vires the power of said Board; (c) that it was null and void as…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Cobb v. HarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Simmons v. ArnimTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Brazos River Authority v. City of GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- WD Haden Company v. DodgenTexas Supreme Court · 1958
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Texas Optometry Board v. Lee Vision Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Burton v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- M. H. Gordon & Son, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. Samuel Alexander Forsgard, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
- Burton v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1973