Legal Opinion
State v. Waller
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided April 28, 2003No. 05-02-01173-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice MOSELEY.
James Douglas Waller filed a motion for post-conviction DNA testing pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See Tex.Code CRiM. PROC. Ann. art. 64.01 (Vernon Supp. 2003). A trial court granted the motion and found the results of mtDNA testing favorable to Waller. The State appeals asserting, in a single point of error, the trial court erred by finding the mtDNA results favorable to Waller. Waller has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, contending this Court does not have jurisdiction. For the reasons below, we grant Waller’s motion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- State v. PatrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Kutzner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Ex Parte EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Rushing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wolfe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- Kerry Max Cook v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2014
- Michael Gowan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015
- State v. Marco Antonio Rodriguez A/K/A David MacIel Garcia A/K/A Eric Linares Villa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.