Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 26, 2019No. 114153Published

1DissentStegall, J.

This case is not only about abortion policy -the most divisive social issue of our day-it is more elementally about the structure of our republican form of government. Which is to say, this case is about the proper conditions for just rule. At bottom, this case is about finding and drawing the sometimes elusive line between law and arbitrary exercises of power. Here we venture onto a battlefield as old as politics itself. And as we argue about the structure of government-and ultimately delineate the proper conditions for just rule-we must never forget that we are also actively engaged in…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API