Legal Opinion

Samma v. U.S. Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 25, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2020-1104Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANGE SAMMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-cv-1104 (ESH) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States has a long history of allowing noncitizens to serve in its military and providing those who serve with an expedited path to citizenship. But in recent years, despite its need for noncitizen enlistees to fill its ranks, the Department of Defense (“DOD”) had placed obstacles in that path to citizenship. DOD’s actions have led to a significant amount of litigation, much of it…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API