Legal Opinion

State v. Parrish

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 2010No. DA 09-0603PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 After six hours of deliberations, a Rosebud County jury convicted William Parrish (Parrish) of criminal endangerment. Parrish appeals the conviction, raising the following issues:

¶2 1. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in denying Parrish’s motion for a new trial based on an alleged Brady violation?

¶3 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in denying Parrish’s motion for a new trial based on the discovery of new evidence?

¶4 3. Did the District Court commit plain error by failing to give a lesser included offense instruction to the jury?

¶5 4. Was Defense Counsel ineffective…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Whitlow v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. GundersonMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. LindbergMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McGarvey v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. WeisbarthMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. Joseph GerenMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. ColvinMontana Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API