State v. Parrish
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 After six hours of deliberations, a Rosebud County jury convicted William Parrish (Parrish) of criminal endangerment. Parrish appeals the conviction, raising the following issues:
¶2 1. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in denying Parrish’s motion for a new trial based on an alleged Brady violation?
¶3 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in denying Parrish’s motion for a new trial based on the discovery of new evidence?
¶4 3. Did the District Court commit plain error by failing to give a lesser included offense instruction to the jury?
¶5 4. Was Defense Counsel ineffective…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Whitlow v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. GundersonMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. LindbergMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McGarvey v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. WeisbarthMontana Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. Joseph GerenMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. ColvinMontana Supreme Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.