Legal Opinion

DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-cv-4575

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 28, 2022No. 3:20-cv-04575Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JULIUS REALTY CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-04575 (ZNQ) (LHG) v. OPINION DAWN E. THOMPSON, an individual, Defendant. QURAISHI, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon a Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint and a Motion to Appoint a Receiver or Fiscal Agent under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 66. The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions and decided the Motion without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API