Punch v. Singer Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEVAL, District Judge.
This motion for summary judgment pertaining to the tricky and complex timing requirements of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (the “ADEA”), raises a refinement of an issue decided by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Reich v. Dow Badische Co., 575 F.2d 363 (2d Cir. 1978).
In Reich a divided court held that, in a state which provides a remedy for age discrimination, an aggrieved party would be barred access to the federal remedy unless he had previously filed a timely claim for state relief. The present case raises…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Charles D. REICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOW BADISCHE COMPANY and Dow Chemical Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Clement GABRIELE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Holliday v. Ketchum, MacLeod & Grove, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Curto v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982