Legal Opinion

Curto v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 15, 1982No. 82 C 1576PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PRENTICE H. MARSHALL, District Judge.

This case presents two important questions under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 (1976 & Supp. II 1978). We must decide what the time limit is for filing an age discrimination complaint under the ADEA with the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (“EEOC”) in a state which provides an administrative remedy for age discrimination, and to what extent a complainant must cooperate with the state administrative agency in order to preserve his or her right to file suit under the ADEA. While the issues…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zewde v. Elgin Community CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  2. Stoecklein v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  3. Soble v. University of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1983
  4. Hay v. Wells Cargo, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1984
  5. Fugate v. Allied Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API