Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Keystone Xl Pipeline, in Re: Cheyenne River Sioux tribe/yankton Sioux tribe/dakota Rural Action

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2018Published

1Opinion of the Court

#28331, #28332, #28333-dismiss-PER CURIAM

2018 S.D. 44

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** IN THE MATTER OF PUC DOCKET HP 14-0001, ORDER ACCEPTING CERTIFICATION OF PERMIT ISSUED IN DOCKET HP 09-001 TO CONSTRUCT THE KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HUGHES COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA **** THE HONORABLE JOHN L. BROWN Judge **** TRACEY ANN ZEPHIER of Attorneys for appellant Fredericks Peebles & Morgan, LLP Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Rapid City, South Dakota #28331. THOMASINA REAL BIRD JENNIFER S. BAKER of Fredericks Peebles & Morgan,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Goetz v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Valley State Bank of Canton v. Farmers State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Pitt-Hart v. Sanford USD Medical CenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API