Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Copeland

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1936No. 18359PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

By way of habeas corpus appellant sought release from the state penitentiary. He appeals from an order remanding him to custody.

Following a conviction in September, 1935, for incest, appellant was duly sentenced and incarcerated in the penitentiary. He contends that incest is not an offense by reason of the fact that it is not defined by the Penal Code of 1925. Hence he insists that the judgment of conviction is void.

Provision was made by Chap. 159, Acts of the 38th Legislature, for the recodification of all the laws of this state, including the Penal Code. The report of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. State ex rel. Scovil v. MoorhouseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pruett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Texas Department of Public Safety v. LaFleur, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  3. Baker v. WadeDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
  4. Town of Port Acres v. City of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Lowry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API