Baker v. Wade
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUCHMEYER, District Judge.
This is a suit by a homosexual, Donald F. Baker, attacking the constitutionality of § 21.06 (“Homosexual Conduct”) of the Texas Penal Code. Section 21.06 (and the related definitions in §§ 1.05 and 21.01) provide:
“A person commits an offense if he [or she] engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex.
“ ‘Deviate sexual intercourse’ means any contact between any part of the genitals of one person and the mouth or anus of another person.”
A violation of this statute is a “Class C misdemeanor,” punishable only by “a fine…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- 37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 598, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,223 Roger W. Rich v. Secretary of the Army, Major General Kenneth R. Dirks, M.D., Former Commander Philip A. Deffer, M.D., Brigadier GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Donald F. Baker v. Henry Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County, Texas, Etc., Danny E. Hill, 47th District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Dumas v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1986
- Briggs v. North Muskegon Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.