Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Jansen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

In all but one respect this case involved an ordinary automobile accident in which two cars going in opposite directions collided and in which the jury on sufficient evidence found that both drivers were negligent in different degrees and assessed the damages sustained. Were it not for the circumstance that the accident occurred on a newly laid state highway which had not been opened to public travel, was barricaded to prevent its use as a highway, and placarded with a sign prohibiting public use as such, this case would have been affirmed without opinion. We shall isolate and discuss only…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brigman v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Brigman v. Fiske-Carter Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Patterson v. Edgerton Sand & Gravel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Shawano County v. Froemming Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Fenske v. Kramp Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hladyshewski v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Bresley v. O'Connor IncorporatedNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Johnston v. Wortham MacHinery Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Eastern Contractors, Inc. v. ZinkandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. McTeer v. Clarkson Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API