Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Edgerton Sand & Gravel Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1938PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

"The’judgment under review is for;the recovery of damages by the plaintiff, Earl Patterson, for' personal injuries which he sustained upon being struck by an automo*14bile truck operated by the defendant, Harry Wescott, as an employee of the Edgerton Sand & Gravel Company. The plaintiff was injured while working in a private gravel pit where he and others were employed on a WPA project under John Finley as foreman. Finley had directed the plaintiff and William Ames, a fellow employee, to remove large, heavy, frozen lumps of ground lying adjacent to the wheel track of a temporary roadway…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hodgson v. Wisconsin Gas & Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Turtenwald v. Wisconsin Lakes Ice & Cartage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Ross v. KobersteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Heikkila v. Standard Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Chille v. HowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Smith v. BassettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Grube v. MothsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Kresha v. KreshaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API