Mary Florence Humphrey Wirt v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Though plaintiff has not had the opportunity to respond to defendant’s motion, the court may address its jurisdiction sua sponte. Johns-Manville Corp. v. United States, 893 F.2d 324, 328 (Fed.Cir.1989); Arctic Corner, Inc. v. United States, 845 F.2d 999, 1000 (Fed.Cir. 1988). After careful consideration of defendant’s brief as well as relevant statutes and case law, the court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss.
FACTS
Plaintiff, Mary Wirt, alleged that her…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- CPT Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992