Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Rowland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 22, 1995No. 1940983PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell Rowland petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Circuit Court of Houston County to permit certain discovery. The issue is whether the court abused its discretion in limiting discovery.

On September 27, 1994, Mr. Rowland brought an action against Bondy's Ford, Inc., and Bondy's agent, Skip Jackson, for damages for breach of contract, breach of express warranty, fraudulent misrepresentation, reckless misrepresentation, and suppression. Mr. Rowland alleged that the defendants had fraudulently induced him to purchase an automobile by misrepresenting to him that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Regal Typewriter Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Harris v. M & S TOYOTA, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Ex Parte Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. LW Johnson & Assoc., Inc. v. RIVERS CONST. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Pugh v. Southern Life and Health Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Ex Parte HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ex Parte HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ex Parte Vulcan Materials Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API