Legal Opinion
Plank v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 29, 2014No. 1D13-4458PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, CLARIFICATION, REQUEST FOR WRITTEN OPINION, AND CERTIFICATION OF CONFLICT
2Per curiam
We deny Appellant’s motion for rehearing, but grant his motion for a written opinion and substitute this opinion in place of our previously issued per curiam affir-mance.
Appellant was found guilty of direct criminal contempt and sentenced to 30 days in jail for arriving drunk to jury duty and disrupting the process of jury selection. He raises three issues in this direct appeal. We affirm two of the issues without further comment, and affirm the remaining issue for the reasons that follow.
Appellan…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Saunders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Searcy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Woods v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Noel Plank v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- M.D.M., a Child v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Noel Plank v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016