Legal Opinion

State v. Barnthouse

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2016No. CC 120431515; CA A153361; SC S063426PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

The decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are affirmed.

BREWER, J.

The issue on review in this case is whether police officers’ handling of an express mail package violated the rights of defendant — the package’s addressee — to be free from an unreasonable seizure of the package under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Fourth Amendment to the United Sates Constitution. As explained below, we conclude that the officers’ actions violated Article I, section 9, and that defendant is entitled to suppression of the evidence discovered as a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Arreola-BotelloOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. LienOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API