Legal Opinion

In re Hunt's Pier Associates

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 93-3500; Bankruptcy No. 91-15644SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*444 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOHN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

On May 20, 1993 the bankruptcy court allowed Baumgardner Construction Co. (“the Company”) a general unsecured claim in the amount of $1,089,029.00 (“the Claim”) against Hunt’s Pier Associates, a general partnership (“the Debtor”). 154 B.R. 436. The Debtor’s appeal from the order of the Honorable David A. Scholl is now before this court *445pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158. For reasons stated herein, the court will affirm the decision of the bankruptcy court.

BACKGROUND

Since its formation, the Debtor has been plagued by disputes among its partners.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kearny PBA Local 21 v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Century Glove, Inc. v. First American Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Eule v. Eule Motor SalesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. CITIBANK, NA v. ErricoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abel v. United States (In Re Abel)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. AdochioDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. In Re Hunt's Pier AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API