Legal Opinion

Pollock v. McAlester Fuel Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 1949No. 4-8946PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeflar, J.

Appellant William M. Pollock, Jr., owned an undivided one-half interest in the oil, gas and other minerals on a certain 20-acre tract in Ouachita County, Arkansas. The owner of the other undivided one-half interest had leased it to appellee Mc-Alester Fuel Company, and the Company was desirous of leasing Pollock’s half also, so that it could drill on the whole tract as a unit. After considerable negotiations between the parties and their representatives, an instrument called an “Oil and Gras Lease” was executed by them under date of July 21, 1947, covering “an undivided one-half (%) interest…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King v. First National Bank of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Reynaud v. BullockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Hooks v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Mitchel v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. R. Lacy, Inc. v. JarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Averyt v. Grande, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Petrus Chrysler-Plymouth v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Williams v. Sohio Petroleum Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  4. Probst v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. McMahon v. ChristmannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API