Probst v. Ingram
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HUSER, Special Justice.
Earl Ingram, Jr., Walter W. Butcher and Texas Gulf Producing Company, hereinafter called plaintiffs, commenced this action against Karl M. Probst, Doris P. Woods, Elsa P. Everett and Fredrica P. Halley, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to quiet title to a certain oil and gas leasehold estate a»d to interpret an oil and gas lease. The tidal court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and defendants appeal.
The trial below was upon an agreed stipulation of facts approved by all parties and their attorneys of record, which shows:
1.That on April 5, 1948, George…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMahon v. ChristmannTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Hooks v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Beatty v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Continental Supply Co. v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- R. Lacy, Inc. v. JarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foster v. Merit Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
- Roye Realty & Developing, Inc. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Roye Realty & Developing, Inc. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Apc Operating Partnership v. Dale G. MacKey and Evelyn C. MacKey and Darrell E. MacKey and Lovell H. MacKeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988