Legal Opinion
In Re Minker
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 25, 1953No. M-1588PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELSH, District Judge.
This is a motion to quash and set aside a District Director of Immigration and Naturalization subpoena commanding the petitioner, Abraham Minker, to appear and testify in a matter concerning himself.
Petitioner’s counsel, in the first instance, contends that the subpoena authority contained in Section 235(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1225(a), only extends to matters involving aliens and aliens and citizens coming into the United States and has no application to citizens residing in the United States. The contention, we think, is not well…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Loufakis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
- Yanish v. WixonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Queja contra los Carreras RoviraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1984
- Barnes v. OddoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Lansky v. SavorettiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- In re OddoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Shaughnessy v. BacolasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.